<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Kiesow 7.0 - Latest Comments</title><link>http://kiesow.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://kiesow.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:45:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Getting Mac EndNote to open .enw files by default</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2018/03/20/getting-mac-endnote-to-open-enw-files-by-default/#comment-3824768114</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sir, you just made my day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Thomas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:45:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Timing is everything</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2016/06/07/timing-is-everything/#comment-2726052833</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"O, you hypocrites, who despise the truths taught you by a true physician, who is himself instructed by Nature, and is a Son of God himself! Come, then, and listen, impostors who prevail only by the authority of your positions!"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">y3shuA imMANu3l</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:14:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Timing is everything</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2016/06/07/timing-is-everything/#comment-2726052268</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John 8:25&lt;br&gt;Then said they unto him, Who art thou? And Jesus saith unto them, Even the same that I said unto you from the beginning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;8+25= 33&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">y3shuA imMANu3l</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:13:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Timing is everything</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2016/06/07/timing-is-everything/#comment-2726049460</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Year of Lord's Wrath👉5777(Hebrew Calendar)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;*Rosh Hashana begins at Sundown on&lt;br&gt;Sunday, 02 October 2016.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;READY?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">y3shuA imMANu3l</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2016 04:08:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The readers we ignore and the news they want</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2015/06/29/the-readers-we-ignore-and-the-news-they-want/#comment-2111584624</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good food for thought, Damon. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mroehrman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 20:02:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The readers we ignore and the news they want</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2015/06/29/the-readers-we-ignore-and-the-news-they-want/#comment-2111416571</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oops. Fixed. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 18:00:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The readers we ignore and the news they want</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2015/06/29/the-readers-we-ignore-and-the-news-they-want/#comment-2111285773</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great piece, quick note: your link to Mobile Me &amp;amp; You points to some Google Chrome extension. I was kinda hoping to find out more about the con.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Chartier</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:40:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The readers we ignore and the news they want</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2015/06/29/the-readers-we-ignore-and-the-news-they-want/#comment-2110461823</link><description>&lt;p&gt;By "not a today" problem I assume you mean it should not still be a problem? Yes, I would say though that there are plenty of people in the business who "get it" and have been working from within for years to effect change. As the literature would argue though - it is not easy to survive disruption.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:03:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The readers we ignore and the news they want</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2015/06/29/the-readers-we-ignore-and-the-news-they-want/#comment-2108835739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is not a today problem. It is a 1990s problem. That is when "the newspaper" decided to fight digital. They saw digital as the end of the newspaper and chose not to adapt. When did they start to? When newspapers were closing down and they started to realize no one wanted to buy news that was one-day old.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The change is happening but unlike commerce that has leveraged digital tremendously --- the newspaper business is still a decade behind.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Axelrod</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:49:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do people read news, why do they pay for it?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/11/20/why-do-people-read-news-why-do-they-pay-for-it/#comment-1133611331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree completely. &lt;br&gt;Then the question is what value can be assigned to that. I contend, for reasons above, we have to concede there's lesser value, or pricing power, in digital than print. The flipside, obviously, is we have the potential for far greater reach.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:34:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do people read news, why do they pay for it?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/11/20/why-do-people-read-news-why-do-they-pay-for-it/#comment-1133532190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not arguing one content approach vs another specifically. But yes, aggregation is huge and we should be doing more of it. That falls under convenience/efficiency. But, depth of niche or geographic coverage is also valuable. What I think we are missing is how to bring the correct UX, context and availability to digital that we do/did for print.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:41:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do people read news, why do they pay for it?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/11/20/why-do-people-read-news-why-do-they-pay-for-it/#comment-1133510393</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damon,&lt;br&gt;OK, fair enough, but let's play that out. &lt;br&gt;The current model splits the mass audience based on individual preferences. In other words, everyone's doing the same thing differently with the hope they attract the largest audience possible. In this regard, "legacy" media sites are no different than social sites.&lt;br&gt;I would contend, then, that this argues for a solution along the lines of an Flipboard, Currents, Ongo model, something that has the ability to aggregate "legacy" and social media with a neat UX and also allows for a pay component or confederated subscriptions.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:27:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do people read news, why do they pay for it?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/11/20/why-do-people-read-news-why-do-they-pay-for-it/#comment-1133073095</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The habits vs needs balance is up for academic debate. Some of the theory focuses on the fact that people look to conserve effort and fall into habit that directs much of their media consumption. But arguably, that habit is only created when original needs are met and reinforced. That takes us back to square one - what is the value to the reader.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Definitely, some of the strength of newsprint is inertia from 50 years of habit. But there is obviously underlying value that goes beyond that. So, are we re-creating enough of that value in digital to attract new readers, and create new habits against the competition posed be Facebook et al.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:33:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do people read news, why do they pay for it?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/11/20/why-do-people-read-news-why-do-they-pay-for-it/#comment-1132218059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Damon,&lt;br&gt;Great stuff. After reading this and considering the comparative strength of print my question is this: Does this really come down to needs vs. wants?&lt;br&gt;Consider the demographics of print subscribers and median length of print subscriptions. These, I think  speak to habits (needs), no?&lt;br&gt;Breaking through the need/want dynamic speaks to engagement and the need for niche content (narrow and deep rather than wide and shallow), either of those creating circumstances more favorable for payment.&lt;br&gt;What do you think?&lt;br&gt;Mark&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Henderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 23:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ONA was mobile-friendly but what does mobile-first look like for news organizations?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/10/20/ona-was-mobile-friendly-but-what-does-mobile-first-look-like-for-news-organizations/#comment-1089742229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Robb. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:00:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ONA was mobile-friendly but what does mobile-first look like for news organizations?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/10/20/ona-was-mobile-friendly-but-what-does-mobile-first-look-like-for-news-organizations/#comment-1089720715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Being mobile first requires us to think about mobile as something different than just digital on a small screen. "&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Amen. Brilliant. This is spot-on thinking.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robb Montgomery</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The death of NFC and the potential of the new news bundle</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/09/12/the-death-of-nfc-and-the-potential-of-the-new-news-bundle/#comment-1044596598</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Andrew - to expand on my answer via Twitter: A lot of media orgs are trying things - Groupon clones, consignment sales, community events, ebooks etc. But I am really looking at a model closer to the old web portal.  E.g. Yahoo has news/sports, but also offers Fantasy Football tools. The question is what are those new services, connecting consumers and advertisers or consumers and non-narrative information we can get involved in.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 13:48:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The death of NFC and the potential of the new news bundle</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2013/09/12/the-death-of-nfc-and-the-potential-of-the-new-news-bundle/#comment-1044394826</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This was very perceptive. Any media organizations you acknowledge for offering a solid new news bundle?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hartpandrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:16:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven mobile trends to watch in 2012</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2011/11/16/seven-mobile-trends-to-watch-in-2012/#comment-406082837</link><description>&lt;p&gt;First of all i would like to wish you happy new year and now i wanted say this is superb information you have shared.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Website Hosting</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 05:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven mobile trends to watch in 2012</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2011/11/16/seven-mobile-trends-to-watch-in-2012/#comment-397058083</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an excellent information you have shared here and i am so glad to found this blog.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Web Hosting Provider</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Living in the cloud</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2011/04/27/living-in-the-cloud/#comment-192389784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scot -&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Well, I admit you have me out-geeked with git repos.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Damon&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:26:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Living in the cloud</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2011/04/27/living-in-the-cloud/#comment-192383654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hear that! My iMac died a week ago, and has been in the shop since. But between Dropbox, Evernote, sync'd calendars and various git repos, I haven't even felt it. Just picked up where I left off with a borrowed Mac. Feels great.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shacker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:11:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving south</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2011/03/28/moving-south/#comment-175018284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Morgen. Everyone is good! So, are you saying you want a piano? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:17:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving south</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2011/03/28/moving-south/#comment-175017216</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats on finishing up a great fellowship and kudos on the new job, Damon! That's very exciting news :) (Hope Annette and Josh are doing well too!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mthiboult</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:15:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Moving south</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2011/03/28/moving-south/#comment-173461145</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Eric.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>