<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Kiesow 7.0 - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-93f9afb9" type="application/json"/><link>http://kiesow.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:17:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The life of a tweet</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/04/10/the-life-of-a-tweet/#comment-8057594</link><description>Most of the retweeters had completed it previously. They were just being helpful to give it a RT.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The life of a tweet</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/04/10/the-life-of-a-tweet/#comment-8057093</link><description>Sounds like you need to work on your conversion rate. Not even all the ppl that retweeted filled out the survey.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The life of a tweet</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/04/10/the-life-of-a-tweet/#comment-8056484</link><description>Monica - I am not familiar with him but will go take a look - thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:24:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The life of a tweet</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/04/10/the-life-of-a-tweet/#comment-8056347</link><description>Okay. This is fascinating. I can't wait to launch another survey!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Leslie-Jean Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:19:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The life of a tweet</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/04/10/the-life-of-a-tweet/#comment-8056307</link><description>I love bit.ly. Why anyone still uses tinyurl is beyond me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">catnip</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The life of a tweet</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/04/10/the-life-of-a-tweet/#comment-8056217</link><description>Hey do you follow @danzarrella? He's got some awesome Twitter tools at &lt;a href="http://danzarrella.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;danzarrella.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Monica Wright</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:14:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pay walls: How does this make sense?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/02/23/pay-walls-how-does-this-make-sense/#comment-7812806</link><description>Here are really numbers: &lt;a href="http://mediacafe.blogspot.com/2009/04/charging-for-online-content-new-updated.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://mediacafe.blogspot.com/2009/04/charging-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nancy Wang</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:18:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ten things for free</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/03/25/ten-things-for-free/#comment-7510883</link><description>-- Vuvox&lt;br&gt;-- Dipity&lt;br&gt;-- Wordle&lt;br&gt;-- Audioboo</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Regina</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:36:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter resources for the newsroom</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2009/02/09/twitter-resources-for-the-newsroom/#comment-6503446</link><description>We're just getting started using this in our newsroom. Thanks for tracking down all the twitter links.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keith Carson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:37:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A link too far?</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/12/23/a-link-too-far/#comment-4606920</link><description>Testing the comments via Facebook Connect.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-524711699</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 08:34:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers as ice cream - or how to torture a metaphor</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/11/20/newspapers-as-ice-cream-or-how-to-torture-a-metaphor/#comment-3930803</link><description>Steve - just goes to show there are no new ideas - just old lessons we have not yet learned.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:14:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers as ice cream - or how to torture a metaphor</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/11/20/newspapers-as-ice-cream-or-how-to-torture-a-metaphor/#comment-3925755</link><description>Milk. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Years ago, when I was still at the Star Tribune, we had a company meeting at which senior managers like publisher Joel Kramer (now the guy behind &lt;a href="http://Minnpost.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Minnpost.com&lt;/a&gt;) and editor Tim McGuire (now at Arizona State) performed in a play. I think Chris Mahai (now &lt;a href="http://Aveus.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Aveus.com&lt;/a&gt;) wrote it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The play was called "Milk." And the theme was pretty much as you describe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Milk comes in exactly one flavor: milk-flavored. Until somebody gets smart about market segmentation and discovers a market for chocolate milk. Or strawberry milk. Or milk delivered as ... ice cream.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The marketing problem we face isn't really about milk or ice cream or the Internet or print. It's about understanding people and their needs and their wants and their interests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And newspapers suck at that. There's no product-development process. No marketing department (neither ad sales nor promotion constitute marketing). No R&amp;D. This has been long recognized, and long bemoaned. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So what are we doing about it these days? Cutting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yelvington</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:22:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Press Newspaper Cancellations: Just Can&amp;#8217;t Quit the AP</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/10/25/associated-press-newspaper-cancellations-just-cant-quit-the-ap/#comment-3309129</link><description>True enough - they gave notice in February. I have added them to the list. Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dkiesow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:22:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Press Newspaper Cancellations: Just Can&amp;#8217;t Quit the AP</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/10/25/associated-press-newspaper-cancellations-just-cant-quit-the-ap/#comment-3306117</link><description>The New York Daily News was one of the first that I heard about giving notice, but I haven't seen it mentioned lately.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William M. Hartnett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:16:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Press Newspaper Cancellations: Just Can&amp;#8217;t Quit the AP</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/10/25/associated-press-newspaper-cancellations-just-cant-quit-the-ap/#comment-3305099</link><description>Well - many of the papers that have given notice have begun to outline some 'replacement' options:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) Regional sharing cooperatives&lt;br&gt;2) Alternative syndicates (probably several to fill the void)&lt;br&gt;3) Reducing wire content and tightening the newshole&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would guess all of the above will happen. On the other hand, if AP does drastically revamp their fee schedule who knows. I don't think anyone wants to have to make this work without AP so there is a lot of incentive for papers to work it out if they can.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:46:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Associated Press Newspaper Cancellations: Just Can&amp;#8217;t Quit the AP</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/10/25/associated-press-newspaper-cancellations-just-cant-quit-the-ap/#comment-3304938</link><description>Hi Damon,&lt;br&gt;So where do you see this going? Any ideas what papers/online will use to fill the void? And maybe for local outlets that not really an issue aside from learning to walk without the AP crutch. My experience recently is that AP locally is more of a competitor than ever, rewriting stories from local news websites and moving them on their wire sometimes within an hour of a post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">curious</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:24:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Its not the layoffs, its the hires</title><link>http://www.kiesow.net/2008/09/notthelayoffsthehires/#comment-2181747</link><description>Well said.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ernesto</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Its not the layoffs, its the hires</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/09/05/notthelayoffsthehires/#comment-2507801</link><description>Well said.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ernesto</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 06:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I got into journalism</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/08/29/why-i-got-into-journalism/#comment-2507800</link><description>Grant - one out of 4 is not bad. And of course I mean the money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:24:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I got into journalism</title><link>http://www.kiesow.net/2008/08/why-i-got-into-journalism/#comment-2154009</link><description>I got into journalism for the same reason everyone did. Money, power, women, and social adoration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's working out pretty well for me so far haha.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Grant Morris</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:15:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling the news without pandering</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/08/08/selling-the-newswithout-pandering/#comment-2507795</link><description>Laura -&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think what we went with was pandering. But the guilt there is - did we leave some readership on the table by not going more tabloid with it. We are definitely not a tab - but building online readership certainly raises these newsroom questions more than it used to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damon</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:02:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling the news without pandering</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/08/08/selling-the-newswithout-pandering/#comment-2507794</link><description>Have been pondering the very same issue this week. There's such a fine line between 'optimisation' and 'selling'.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The arts of SEO and search engine marketing are being employed to different degrees by online newspapers here in the UK (just wrote something about the ethical issues around buying keywords - &lt;a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/532081.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/532081.php&lt;/a&gt;). While tabloid style headlines might bring higher search rankings are you compromising your content by doing so?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hmmm, I'm not really answering your questions just adding more...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think it's pandering though - on one hand, if you're content is optimised for search engines then you're better serving those readers who access it indirectly. Helping them find you content isn't pandering.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laura Oliver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:31:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Looking for multimedia judges</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/07/30/looking-for-multimedia-judges/#comment-2507792</link><description>@Will - thanks - much appreciated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;@Jody - I wish I had a PR campaign we needed judged. You would be perfect! :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damon</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Looking for multimedia judges</title><link>http://www.kiesow.net/2008/07/looking-for-multimedia-judges/#comment-2154002</link><description>I'm interested but photography isn't my core thing, not like you and Annette. Global e-marketing campaigns is, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jody Myers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 23:57:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Looking for multimedia judges</title><link>http://kiesow.net/2008/07/30/looking-for-multimedia-judges/#comment-2507790</link><description>If Roanoke has another Virgina Tech or something, St. Louis will take it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Will Sullivan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:38:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>